If you don’t know why this CDC Lawsuit is a thing now, well then, you should definitely get to know the details of this case. Just to brief you, this lawsuit is filed by two doctors who are asking the question of why it is so necessary to give kids so many vaccines on such a tight schedule. That’s a legit question right there, and let’s see what the law makes of it.
What’s the CDC’s Vaccine Schedule?
The CDC has endorsed a vaccination timetable for children, this is essentially an organized plan that outlines the time when kids should be administered a particular vaccine. The issue highlighted in the court case is the fact that this schedule has changed a lot over time.
It has been said that the number of vaccines administered to children has increased significantly from about 24 doses to more than 72 doses when they are 18 years old. That is a massive increase.
Doctors no longer claim that the vaccines themselves are unsafe. Their question, however, is whether anyone has adequately verified the effects of combining a large number of vaccines. It is only logical to carry out such experiments for each vaccine separately, but these tests do not indicate how a child’s body will react if he or she gets multiple injections within a short time.
Who Filed the Lawsuit?
Dr. Paul Thomas and Dr. Kenneth Stoller, both with a controversial history regarding vaccines, have gone on to take legal action against vaccines.
Dr. Paul Thomas carried out a research project in which he compared fully vaccinated and partially vaccinated children. He asserted that those kids who had been given fewer vaccines developed fewer chronic diseases. Subsequently, his license to practice medicine was revoked.
Dr. Kenneth Stoller used genetic testing to provide vaccine exemptions on the basis of potential health risks in children. He lost his medical license.
Currently, these two physicians have taken legal action in Washington, D.C.
What Are They Asking For?
The legal action is not targeted at the removal of vaccines. The plaintiffs ask for more rigorous safety studies and looser guidelines.
Essentially, the major part of vaccines from the CDC’s timetable are currently classified as “Category A,” like they are recommended for all children. Physicians are demanding that these vaccines be reclassified as “Category B”, so that doctors and parents would then make the decision, rather than it being a default or mandated option.
What’s the Bigger Issue Here?
The current legal action is related to a broader sceptical movement towards the way the authorities deal with vaccination policies. In addition to this, there is a different lawsuit in Nevada asserting that a federal safety committee of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), in charge of vaccine safety, had ceased operations several years back. The lack of the committee was the reason it was going to be overseeing vaccine safety, but by the claim, it had dissolved quietly.
From that point onwards, the quantity of vaccines has notably escalated, at the same time, since the figures of autism and children’s chronic health problems have increased.
Where Does RFK Jr. Fit Into This?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is currently in charge of the Department of Health and Human Services, used to be one of the most vocal critics of vaccine safety. Nevertheless, after his takeover, he has initiated several changes, among which some are quite remarkable:
- Restarted the previously inactive vaccine safety group
- Reduced funding for some vaccine programs
- Rolled back vaccine guidance for pregnant women and healthy children
- Changed members of the CDC’s vaccine advisory board (ACIP) to include experts who support more cautious vaccine policies
